|
Frequent questions Here are the answers to a series
of recurring questions, of general interest, which we received from people
visiting our Web Site (please send any
queries to: info@biotronstiftung.net
) What
were the pre-conditions that originated and led to the spreading of Ing. Enzo
Maggiore’s therapeutic method? The start was his firm conviction that underlying all pathologies,
there is a cause whose origin is either genetic or environmental. The main source consists in microbacteria in the environmental context
(Viruses, Fungi, Bacteria) that intervene originally or subsequently on the
living mass (human, animal, vegetable) complicating the disorder in the
organic system. Ing. Enzo Maggiore’s experiments have shown that once the cause or the
causes of the pathology are removed, the pathology disappears, and it is then
necessary to face the problems created previously by the pathology or by incorrect
therapies. In the Foundation it is
believed that pathogenic micro-organisms give rise to diseases. Could you
tell us more about this? About 150,000 microorganisms have pathogenic importance. Their
combination leads to an infinite variety of pathologies, many of which are
still not described and defined in the case histories. Furthermore,
microorganisms are constantly changing and it is not by chance that due to a
particular law of survival, the more they are attacked and fought, the more
they strengthen their protections, increasing their defences, i.e. through
their aggressive characteristics and the also “silently waiting” in a kind of
stand-by mode. In the effort to fight
tumoral pathologies, conventional medicine, based on the results of
laboratory tests or alterations in the anatomical structures, tends to remove
the infected areas of the body by means of surgery, or to bombard the infected
areas with X-rays or chemicals. In this sense, it confirms your belief in the
theory of the expediency of removing the infected areas. Where is the difference
between your conception and that of conventional medicine? This is a
vast topic, we will limit our reply by simply providing a few brief
considerations. With surgery the aim is to remove the area that is most affected by
the infection, thinking that by removing the body mass, in this area of
turbulence among cells, the conflict will be eliminated and the patient may
return to his usual functions. Our theory claims that the sources of microorganism infection are not
necessarily localised in the area where surgery is performed, but these may
be found (and this is the case most of the time) in other organs and may be
carried also from far away. Therefore, by means of surgery it is possible to temporarily
remove the disorder, but total removal of the cause is not achieved, and it
will re-propose its pathological symptoms. In practice, conventional medicine treatment proposes temporary
solutions that are costly from a financial point of view, and are often
invalidating and psychologically demanding. The same may be said for
radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatments. In other words, if we consider the new military wars, intelligent
bombs apparently avoid widespread destruction, but collateral damage is
always registered on the targets, and these imply repercussions that may even
be very severe. Non-invasive methods, wherever these are possible, are the best, the
most ethical and least expensive solution. As far as we know, Ing. Maggiore’s method is the most convenient in
terms of results and quality of life. . How
did Ing. Enzo Maggiore reach these conclusions, indicating solutions to
remove fungi, bacteria and viruses efficiently? Ing. Enzo Maggiore, who has had a technical and scientific training and
a fruitful professional experience as a researcher at the Istituto
Zooprofilattico sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche (click www.pg.izs.it) (experimental
zooprophylactic institute of the Umbria and Marche regions), in Perugia, is
considered to be a leading specialist in cell electrostructure. The cultural and geographic area of his research work was the
Mediterranean basin, focussing particular attention on recovering the medical
and philosophical heritage of the monotheist cultures (Jewish, Christian,
Muslim). Chinese, Indian, Himalayan, shamanic medical and traditional
influences, even though well known, were not taken into consideration, but
Euro-Arab, Middle-Eastern experience dating back to ancient times and the middle
ages, have been dealt with once again and re-interpreted taking into
consideration the scientific development of our times. Ing Maggiore has
prepared a combination of herbal extracts with reference to the contrasting effect
against bacteria, fungi and parasites whose action is to activate the immunological
defences of the human organism to achieve total removal of all infections. And
to fight the viral action, where conventional therapies are still practically
ineffective, he has designed a special instrument that eliminates the viral
load, without damaging the host cells. (click More
information about Biohelp ). How
do you intervene in the case of tumours? We have noted that tumours are a confirmation of the presence of a
pre-existing pathology caused by an association of a number of microorganisms
in a pathogenic combination. Preventive interventions to remove the causes of
infection following our indications can prevent the tumour from developing. Immediate
removal of the sources, when the pathology is present, can slow them down up until
the degenerative process is stopped. The progress will be more problematic if
this action follows invasive surgery treatment, chemotherapy and
radiotherapy, due to the consequences of the treatments which strongly
jeopardize the organism’s immune system capacity. How
do you determine the presence and type of infesting microorganisms? The healthcare industry makes enormous investments in the diagnostic
and investigational field. Official medicine offers a number of possible
choices, but there are also a number of limits. On our part, with other partners, we have developed our method to
cover the micro-organisms diagnostic investigation requirements. What
relations do you have with the doctors and healthcare facilities? We have not had the chance or the opportunity to share our methods with
the healthcare facilities. We have good research and cooperation relationships with the doctors
who work and use their knowledge in intellectually independent conditions and
who are financially independent: we are in contact exclusively with this type
of doctor, with whom it is possible to intervene and work constructively.
|
|
|